Flex is really just for front-end stuff. It still needs a back-end technology such as CF (or Java or ASP). Somebody blogged recently that Flex isn't really good for regular websites, but is great for intranet applications. I think we'll start to see some pretty cool website stuff too though.
On 6/28/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The two do entirely separate things. How can a rich client interface > technology replace an application server tecnology? > > On 6/28/06, kurt schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've developed cf for 10 years now, love it, love dot.net too for that > matter, but what about Flex? A few people have suggested to me that cf seems > to be on the way out to be replaced with Flex. From their perspective as > non-cf developers this seems to be the case. My vision is clouded so i'd > like to ask it plainly as if I were not a CF developer. Is CF on the way out > and is Felx the intended replacement? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:244972 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
