Well I can see you doing some interesting things with this technique, but honestly, I can't see a scenario in which a classloader of some description won't provide you with the same functionality.
Also there are definatley places I would prefer to have a ClassLoader - using the latest version of log4j comes to mind for example. If you actually replaced that in the ColdFusion classpath you are quite liable to break aspects of ColdFusion as a whole. Mark On 7/25/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark, > > It does not matter because I can't go back to classloaders. I have java > voice apps running, new crazy JDBC embedded java databases running inside > the admin on shared hosts uses stealth datasources and the people I work for > depend on me to get the job done at runtime and by any means necessary. No > way can I go back. > I should have another look at that class and see what other people are > saying about it but I don't have to wrap any > java objects ever again. The days of wrapping are officially over! > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:247579 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
