Why would you need to do it that way? Just use a loop.



"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Aug 03 02:26:27 2006
Subject: Re: MassMailings CFMAIL

Matt,

I am a little curious why you would suggest to not put it all into the To:
field? I have written a basic mail server once before, and believe me you
have confused me here. The logic behind mutliple multiple email address in a
to: field or bcc: etc are duplicated and sent out by any decent mail server
and as CF is not a mail server then I am very curious. Maybe I am missing
something?



On 8/3/06, Matt Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you're on a shared server you could have resource issues.  In no
> event should you ever pile in multiple mail addressees into the To
> field.
>
> Send everything as a discrete message and throttle down the mail.  I
> would say 20k is the outside of the envelope for conveniently doing
> this but I have clients who do it regularly.
>
> Do a decent throttle speed and no one -- including spam frequency
> filters who can get the wrong idea from your 20k email blast -- will
> notice you.  20 every 10 seconds would trickle the list out in less
> than 3 hours.  I would do 10 every 10 and just run it overnight.
>
> http://mysecretbase.com/Slowing_Down_CFMail_2004.cfm
>
> Its about time I did a 2006 version that also incorporates try/catch
> to collect individual bad email addresses (i.e. badly formatted) and
> let the routine continue if it finds any.  I've got it running like
> that in my CMS' mass mailer component.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Janitor, MSB Web Systems
> mysecretbase.com
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248695
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to