Go to my blog:

http://www.reybango.com

I've kept a list there.

Rey...

Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> Has anyone done a definitive list of the best frameworks we are all using?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
> Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
> confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John C. Bland II
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Thu Aug 31 19:33:05 2006
> Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using?
> 
> By 0 to 60 I am referring to the learning curve. Backbase has a steep one.
> 
> Exactly on the pricing. If they had reasonable pricing for not just large 
> corp's, they might have a better adoption because it is very robust.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using?
> 
> 
> 
>>Yep, I have used it extentively and I love it. You described it to a tee. 
>>It
>>is an application framework not a library in the sense of other listings. 
>>It
>>is a Flex HTML rival. It is not aiming to be an plug n play js library.
>>
>>What is all this nonsense about 0 to 60? :-)
>>
>>It's debugging is amazing, it has all the features you can think of, but
>>again, as you rightly note it is expensive. But as they noted, large
>>companies such as ours do not care about 5K :-)
>>
>>If money is not your concern and you want to build an RIA app, not just an
>>Ajax tool then it should be considered.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
>>Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
>>Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
>>confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of 
>>the
>>intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please 
>>note
>>that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
>>information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
>>received this communication in error please return it to the sender or 
>>call
>>our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within 
>>this
>>communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
>>Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: John C. Bland II
>>To: CF-Talk
>>Sent: Thu Aug 31 17:12:39 2006
>>Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using?
>>
>>Neil, Backbase is more robust, I'll give it that, but have you used it.
>>Speaking specifically about 0 to 60, Backbase is horrible. It takes you
>>completely away from your normal way of handling xhtml and attempts to
>>provide MXML/XAML functionality. The things it can do are pretty
>>amazing/great but their implementation simply isn't desireable AND the 
>>price
>>
>>is ridiculous.When I spoke to them about it the reps answer was (in my
>>words; it has been some months since I spoke to them) "the big companies
>>don't mind the price." We went round and round but ultimately he said to
>>wait a few weeks for an announcement regarding the community edition.
>>Anyways, Backbase forces you to change your entire infrastructure and base
>>it around them. For Ajax, that isn't desireable.
>>
>>I doubt Tom is using Spry because it is free. Spry is a great tool and 0 
>>to
>>60, as I said, it is #1 in my book. Most ajax toolkits are free and those
>>that cost, to me, aren't worth it. You can grab a DHTML library and
>>something like JSMX and rival Backbase, or others, any day.
>>
>>Disclaimer:
>>That is all IMO. :-)
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 3:55 AM
>>Subject: RE: Ajax - Whats everybody using?
>>
>>
>>
>>>That only cause it is free? I would say Backbase is better than Spry but
>>>it
>>>is pricey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: 31 August 2006 11:36
>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using?
>>>
>>>On Thursday 31 August 2006 05:21, Rey Bango wrote:
>>>
>>>>For those doing Ajax work in conjunction with CF, I'd like to know what
>>>>framework(s) you're using.
>>>
>>>Flex2 :-)
>>>More seriously, if I were doing a DHTML project I'd pick Spry.
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>
>>>Tom Chiverton
>>>Helping to autoschediastically initiate fifth-generation metrics
>>>
>>>****************************************************
>>>
>>>This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
>>>
>>>Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
>>>and
>>>Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is
>>>at
>>>St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is
>>>available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a
>>>partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP.
>>>Regulated by the Law Society.
>>>
>>>CONFIDENTIALITY
>>>
>>>This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and
>>>may
>>>be confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you
>>>must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy 
>>>it
>>>nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its
>>>existence or contents.  If you have received this email in error please
>>>delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.
>>>
>>>For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251679
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to