I don't know about that... TortoiseSVN comes with a ".NET hack", so obviously people are using that for .NET instead of Source Safe. You might want to look into it.
Russ > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Lancelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 8:05 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Holy crap I like CFEclipse! > > LOL - I wish... > > Unfortuneately comercial realities mean that is not going to happen... > > We dev some .Net stuff aswell as CF - so Source Safe is a necessary > evil... > and tbh for what we want it works absolutely fine (apart from the > integration with DW - which as everything else integrates fine - must be > the > fault of DW) > > Also for what this guy does (he's a junior developer doing lots of small > changes to mainly static sites) DW is a timesaving tool... > > On 9/11/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Agreed, DW is useless, but I think the bigger issue is that you're using > > SourceSafe. Get rid of the demon and go to SVN. (Then just tell that > one > > guy that DW is no longer supported due to it's non integration with SVN > > and > > make him use CFE :-P ) > > > > Russ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Daniel Lancelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:53 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: Holy crap I like CFEclipse! > > > > > > > > Turn off the design view and you've got a serious code editor. > > > > > > > > I tend to disagree, in my opinion the real added value in DW are > > certain > > > > visual tools, if you don't use them, you are better served by > > CFEclipse > > > or > > > > a > > > > traditional code editor, faster and with a smaller footprint, like > > > > EditPlus, > > > > UltraEdit, or even good old Homesite. > > > > > > > > > Completely agree - only time I use DW is for rapid edits of static > HTML > > > (laying out html emails etc). > > > > > > We have guy's on the team here who use DW for everything - and this > has > > > exposed a quite annoying """feature""" - namely its broken SourceSafe > > > integration. > > > > > > If a file is checked out to another user, and you try editing it > within > > > DW, > > > DW will remove the write protection on the file, but will not check it > > > out. > > > > > > THIS IS WRONG! > > > > > > No other source control product that I have ever used works in this > > way... > > > > > > The write protection and the check out status go hand in hand - and > you > > > should not be able to edit a file which is not checked out. > > > > > > What's even worse, is that if you then try and save the file, DW will > go > > > and > > > checkout the file over your changed file, and irrecoverably lose all > > your > > > changes. > > > > > > In addition, if you try and do a search and replace across multiple > > files, > > > some of which have been checked out, edited and saved, and some of > which > > > are > > > still checked in, DW will prompt you to ask if you want to check out > > > un-checked out files. If you click yes, not only will DW check out > the > > > un-checked out files, but also all the ones already checked out and > > > changed > > > - losing all work since you last checked your files in!!!! > > > > > > My colleague has lost a sum total of at least 12 hours work due to > DW's > > > sourcesafe bugs. I meanwhile use CF Eclipse with the free VSS > Explorer > > > eclipse plug in - and have never had any (VSS related) problems... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252815 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
