Funny you should mention that, it's one of the things I am considering adding to feed-squirrel.com. I'm just on the look out for some decent forum software. Cf based would be ideal, but phpBB is definitely tempting
Neil On 10/13/06, Tom King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This might be one argument for starting a forum, rather than having > an email list - I find it quite difficult to "browse" Houseoffusion.... > Hence, flogged horses are dragged out more often than they might be > (rather than just "see so and so thread")... > Ironically, the change to a forum rather than a mailing list is > probably another flogged horse... > T > > > On 13 Oct 2006, at 15:39, Teddy Payne wrote: > > > John, > > It is not a touchy subject. It is shall we say a, "well beaten > > horse." It > > is not your fault. > > > > I was just trying to prevent yet another thread that forces so many to > > justify themselves uneccessarily. > > > > We enjoy the product to the point where we subject ourselves to > > debates so > > strong that bloggers and podcasters report the results like boxing > > title > > fights. > > > > Teddy > > > > On 10/13/06, John Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On 10/13/06, Cutter (CFRelated) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> John, > >>> > >>> I would agree with you, if it weren't for guys like NewAtlanta > >>> putting > >>> out a free version of BlueDragon or the Railo project. Cost is not a > >>> valid argument any more (NewAtlanta has offered a free edition of BD > >>> since....2003? Josh, Vince, pipe in anytime here). Not trying to > >>> start a > >>> pissing contest here, just saying that there are options if one is > >>> willing to research them. > >> > >> > >> heh, you guys seem to think I am shying away from CF because of > >> cost. I > >> am > >> obviously on this list, and am using CF daily. Just saying what my > >> impression was prior to using it, and why I wouldn't have learned > >> CF had I > >> not taken my current position. It's no biggie to me at all, but > >> to say > >> that > >> there isn't an impression of cost associate, again, I say > >> impression is > >> over > >> looking one obvious difference. No one needs to convince me > >> though either > >> way though. > >> > >> To me it doesn't really matter one way or another as long as I can > >> do a > >> cost > >> justification. A programming language is just a tool to use to > >> meet an > >> end. To me, I don't really care if I am writing in PHP / Ruby / > >> ColdFusion, > >> as long as I can do what I need to do. If I can make a case that CF > >> allows > >> me to do it faster with less man-power, then great, I can justify the > >> cost. > >> No biggie. Are CF developers less for me to hire than PHP / > >> Ruby / PERL > >> developers? Great, I can justify the cost. No biggie. > >> > >> I admit that I am new here, so my apologies for the comment if > >> bringing up > >> costs associated is a touchy subject, as it appears to be. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256737 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
