On 10/13/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > So basically these days the cost argument is quite frankly pure crap.
I have to disagree. "Workarounds" to get "free" don't qualify as "free", and the solutions mentioned as free (BD and ralio(sp?)) aren't "free", really... have you read the fine print? "Value" is such a fun term, anyways. Very malleable. Ohh, Malleable. I love that word. Yeah, there are things I like about CF and that it "costs", and things I don't like. Not sure if there's a right or wrong. The only thing that bugs me is "open source" stuff with it isn't really "open source", since the engine itself isn't open source. Now, I guess the same goes for Java, I reckon, last I checked, so.... eh, I don't know. Computers ain't "free"... How far down the rabbit hole to go, neh? But cost is for sure a factor of CF, no ifs, ands, or buts. So sayeth a D-Man! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256762 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
