True, it is how you do it that matters. I doubt many seasoned developers use cfform these days so hopefully it would cater for this as well.
As for what it should cover, well certainly all the standard "ooh that is cool" stuff but hopefully also Drag and Drop, native ColdFusion Object support for sending/receiving to mention a few but could go on all night! "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Ben Forta To: CF-Talk Sent: Fri Oct 13 19:43:16 2006 Subject: RE: CF & AJAX & FLEX, The future of them; the future of web? Dave is correct. The exact framework is not what I really care about. What is more interesting to me is "what common problems facing CF developers could Ajax help solve, and can we find a way to solve those easily". For example, related selected boxes, auto-suggest in text fields, stuff like that. If we could make those as simple as we did JavaScript validation in <cfinput> then we'll be solving real problems and helping developers. And those that want more will always have the option of using whatever framework they want. --- Ben -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF & AJAX & FLEX, The future of them; the future of web? > The problem here is the amount of frameworks/flavours of Ajax out > there. The only way you will be sure to keep everyone happy is to > include them all :-) All they have to is integrate one that works nicely, and most CF developers will then use that by default. You don't get a choice of built-in AJAX frameworks if you want to use ASP.NET, you use Atlas. I don't see why it would be any different with CF. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256756 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
