Technically, this would be the highest quality thumbnail Bicubic, Compression 95. (the bottom right one)
http://www.opensourcecf.com/imagecfc/thumbnail_test/emily_tn_6.jpg Same image, same format, more bytes. You can also use windows magnifier to zoom way in and compare the pixilation. Oddly enough, the compression 95 seems to be a better quality all the way down the line. I would think that would be the other way around. Are you sure they are listed right? But if you want to know just by looking at them, I dont think anyone will notice a difference with the naked eye at that particular height and width. ;-) ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -----Original Message----- From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Interpolation Can anyone tell me if any of these three thumbnails are of better quality than the others? http://www.opensourcecf.com/imagecfc/thumbnail_test/ I'm playing around with some of the java image rendering settings trying to get better thumbnail quality out of image.cfc, but I have 20/50 vision even when I'm wearing my glasses so I can't be relied on for this kind of judgement :) They're actually each slightly different in size, but even if I load the thumbnails into photoshop and blow them up 300%, I can't tell the difference. Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:263203 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
