Andy Matthews wrote: > > You're probably off on your testing. Your source image is fairly low quality > to begin with. A good quality photo of that size should be around 100k or > more, this one is only 30k. Look at the area just to the left of her chin > and on her hand...you can see some pixelation. Start with the highest res > image you can find, one that's crystal clear, then work with that one.
I hadn't thought about that... I've got the original at home... > Also, you really need to change your compression settings. The difference > between 90 and 95 is going to be barely noticeable to someone who works with > images all the time, much less to these code jockeys. > > Try a 70% and a 90% setting along with the higher quality original, then > let's try again. I've found that using anything below 80% compression looks awful.. I did 90% and 95% because the CFC defaults to 90%, and I just wanted to see if it would improve going to 95%... But when I get home tonight I'll try the 70/90 thing anyway. Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:263219 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
