Mark, that's a great idea. Personally, I'd rather not list porn sites at all, but I realize that I can't force my views on anyone. However, I hadn't thought of my client's sites being listed amongst them... very good reasoning. Well done. I'd be okay with a separate section. Rey? What do you think?
Chris Mark A Kruger wrote: > I would prefer a separate category or page for "adult" or "mature" themed > sites. Here's my reasoning - posted in good humor and with no intent to > flame or be flamed... (I forgot my asbestos underwear today). > > For me this is less a moral issue than a business issue. The owners of the > sites that I've submitted (about 10 or 15 sites) would not appreciate or > consent to being listed intermingled with overtly adult content sites... I > want CF to have a professional and corporate reputation. I don't include > hooter's girls in my family portrait (though there was the year I wore a > duck suit) and I don't wish for my good customers to have a reason to > question my wisdom in posting their links. Plus grouping all the adults > sites together allows us to carefully scrutinize them so we can be properly > outraged. Can't we evangelize without offending? > > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mik Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:22 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site > > Define "legal" porn, please. Will you have a separate section for that? :-Q > > Mik > > > At 11:57 AM 3/5/2007, Rey Bango wrote: > >> Hi Janet, >> >> It has to be a site that runs CF in some way but I've reserved the >> right to not list, or remove, a site if it has no redeeming value to >> the CF community. I mentioned in a previous post that I'm very lenient >> but some things just won't get posted. This includes: >> >> * Bogus websites >> * Spam >> * Sites that contain any type of inappropriate content such as racism, >> hate-groups, illegal porn and that sort of stuff >> * Link bait >> >> So I'm going to continue to be flexible in what gets submitted but if I >> see a site, for example, that has 50 .Net pages and 1 CF page, that >> site won't get added. >> >> Rey... >> >> Janet MacKay wrote: >> >>> Rey, >>> >>> I confess I haven't read anything about gotCFM.com (other than this >>> > thread). > >>> So my question is what are the requirements for sites listed on >>> > gotCFM.com? Does a site only have to run CF (whether they have _one_ cfm > page or a thousand) or does the site have to contain an _application_ that > is powered (in whole or in part) by CF? Or none of the above ..? > >>> Janet >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:271597 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
