I don't see the need for including porn. There are plenty of other examples of CF working in a high volume scenario. I see this as an educational site. Why have it become controversial over links to porn? Now the kid making a case of CF in his high school class can't access the site because some overzealous school official bans the site because there is a link to porn. I vote no Ken Ketsdever Associate Programmer Analyst Department of Pesticide Regulation (916) 324-2990
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/5/2007 12:29 PM >>> OH! Well done! :o) Cheers, Chris Rey Bango wrote: > I've added a dropdown which will allow visitors to choose sites by > category. Also, the initial load of the list will exclude any mature or > adult themed sites. You will need to explicitly select that category to > view it. > > Rey > > Mark A Kruger wrote: > >> No prob.... :) >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:57 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site >> >> Absolutely. Thats the type of feedback that I was looking for. >> >> Thanks Mark. >> >> Rey >> >> Mark A Kruger wrote: >> >>> I would prefer a separate category or page for "adult" or "mature" >>> themed sites. Here's my reasoning - posted in good humor and with no >>> intent to flame or be flamed... (I forgot my asbestos underwear today). >>> >>> For me this is less a moral issue than a business issue. The owners of >>> the sites that I've submitted (about 10 or 15 sites) would not appreciate or >>> consent to being listed intermingled with overtly adult content sites... I >>> want CF to have a professional and corporate reputation. I don't >>> include hooter's girls in my family portrait (though there was the >>> year I wore a duck suit) and I don't wish for my good customers to >>> have a reason to question my wisdom in posting their links. Plus >>> grouping all the adults sites together allows us to carefully >>> scrutinize them so we can be properly outraged. Can't we evangelize >>> without offending? >>> >>> -Mark >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mik Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:22 PM >>> To: CF-Talk >>> Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site >>> >>> Define "legal" porn, please. Will you have a separate section for >>> that? :-Q >>> >>> Mik >>> >>> >>> At 11:57 AM 3/5/2007, Rey Bango wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Janet, >>>> >>>> It has to be a site that runs CF in some way but I've reserved the >>>> right to not list, or remove, a site if it has no redeeming value to >>>> the CF community. I mentioned in a previous post that I'm very >>>> lenient but some things just won't get posted. This includes: >>>> >>>> * Bogus websites >>>> * Spam >>>> * Sites that contain any type of inappropriate content such as >>>> racism, hate-groups, illegal porn and that sort of stuff >>>> * Link bait >>>> >>>> So I'm going to continue to be flexible in what gets submitted but if >>>> I see a site, for example, that has 50 .Net pages and 1 CF page, that >>>> site won't get added. >>>> >>>> Rey... >>>> >>>> Janet MacKay wrote: >>>> >>>>> Rey, >>>>> >>>>> I confess I haven't read anything about gotCFM.com (other than this >>>>> >>> thread). >>> >>>>> So my question is what are the requirements for sites listed on >>>>> >>> gotCFM.com? Does a site only have to run CF (whether they have _one_ >>> cfm page or a thousand) or does the site have to contain an >>> _application_ that is powered (in whole or in part) by CF? Or none of the >>> above ..? >>> >>>>> Janet >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:271604 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
