Jonathan, What is it that Transfer doesn't provide for you, that you need in your application generation?
Figured I would ask the question, as I'm always looking for areas in which Transfer canbe improved. Mark On 10/23/07, Jonathon Stierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I looked into both Transfer and Reactor, and while they're awesome for DAO, > they don't really give me all I'm looking for (*entire* -- or at least most > of it -- application generation). I have been referencing Transfer for > ideas when building my own CFC's -- so there's definitely more than a little > overlap. But in the end, I'd rather have something tailor fit to my needs > than try to mold Transfer or Reactor into something it's not necessarily > meant for. > > Jonathon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:03 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: programmatically add functions to a CFC > > Well hey, your project fits the bill afaik for needing a mix-in of some > sort. I guess Transfer and Reactor didn't fit the bill? It sounds like those > are similar projects. Anyways, yes, a cfinclude will do it for ya. > > -- > nathan strutz > http://www.dopefly.com/ > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:291798 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
