The Server Monitor doesn't ship with CF8 Standard, hence why Ben is looking at alternatives.
Andy ps Fusion Reactor gets my nod On 24/10/2007, Peterson, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ben - the integrated server monitor in CF8 was not enough to figure out > the errors? (from the admin, check out server monitor on the left) > > I have FusionReactor on CF7 Ent, and I agree it is much cleaner than the > demo I tried of SeeFusion. I have never had a problem with it. > > Chris Peterson > Gainey IT > Adobe Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:46 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: SeeFusion vs. FusionReactor > > I'm about to invest in one of these, and I'm looking for advice and/or > practical experience. We have several applications running, and we're > trying to hunt down the source of site slowdowns. Is there an > overriding reason to pick one over the other? > > I'm currently leaning toward FusionReactor -- it seems cleaner and > easier to use. It is, of course, a bit more expensive. Is it worth the > > extra money? > > For reference, I'm running CF8 Standard on Win2k3 R2. > > --Ben Doom > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Enterprise web applications, build robust, secure scalable apps today - Try it now ColdFusion Today ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:291966 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
