Regardless, I currently have one instance on one server. So licensing structure isn't a big deal.
--Ben Doom DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT) wrote: > Even with that change to the licensing, that still costs more than > Fusion Reactor when you have 6 CF instances on one box. 1 Fusion > Reactor License or 3 SeeFusion licenses. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:10 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: SeeFusion vs. FusionReactor > > Actually, the SeeFusion pricing is a little different then that. > > http://www.seefusion.com/index.cfm?do=c.whatsnew > > The last item on this page details their 2 for 1 pricing model. > > ================== > > New 2-for-1 pricing model for individual servers > For any single physical server, every 2 ColdFusion instances that you > want to monitor now require just 1 SeeFusion license. So for a server > with 4 ColdFusion instances that you want to monitor, you'd need 2 > SeeFusion licenses. Or, for 2 physical servers each with 2 ColdFusion > instances you want to monitor, you'd also still only need 2 SeeFusion > licenses. > > ================== > > ~Brad > > > A SeeFusion license had to be purchased for each instance of ColdFusion > running on the server. Whereas, one FusionReactor license was used per > server (not instance). > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the answers you are looking for on the ColdFusion Labs Forum direct from active programmers and developers. http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid-72&catid=648 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:292071 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
