Yeah, I agree with that JJ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J.J. Merrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 9:24 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT: SSL Necessary? Important?
> 
> And on the topic I would say that it probably is overkill but a lot of
> times peoples perception of security makes them happy. I think it is a
> far more worst security risk that someone just downloads the thing and
> sells it then for someone to sniff the packets to get a couple of
> addresses and phone numbers.
> 
> It's like here in nashville there was a breakin at the election
> commission and laptops were stolen with all the voter roles on them...
> which meant SS numbers etc. People freaked out and the city ended up
> having to pay for credit monitoring services and send out 2 mailed
> letters to everyone registered to vote in Davidson County. Probably
> not cheap at all.
> 
> Come to find out the laptops were stolen by a homeless guy along with
> a space heater and a radio. They recovered the laptops only to
> discover they weren't even turned on!
> 
> In the end give the client what they want and if they are willing to
> pay a little bit more for a sense of security have at it.
> 
> J.J.
> 
> On 1/24/08, J.J. Merrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yeah, it really isn't bad. Depending on the host they might have a
> > shared SSL cert you can use. Essentially they just map your site as a
> > folder underneath a larger site.
> >
> > In the end it is like $20 for a low-end cert that will get you the
> > encryption you want/need and  a couple of bucks for a static IP a
> > month from their webhost.
> >
> > J.J.
> >
> > On 1/24/08, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What's the total cost, typically?
> > >
> > > Cost of the SSL Cert, plus a dedicated IP (required, correct?),
> > > plus whatever other charges an ISP may charge?
> > >
> > > Rick
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:02 AM
> > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > Subject: Re: OT: SSL Necessary? Important?
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 24, 2008 11:38 AM, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >  >>Is the SSL encryption overkill for something like this?
> > > > >
> > > > > IMHO yes.
> > > > > Unless they are willing to pay for more protection, because it is not 
> > > > > free.
> > > >
> > > > Unless they use OpenSSL and self-sign, which is free. Of course users
> > > > may not desire the warning about an untrusted cert, so it's not
> > > > perfect.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
> > > > http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:297310
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to