2008/6/7 Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  I also take issue with the quote of "has to go open source" which implies
> that is the only way for these alternative engines to survive and that is
> simply not true. Both companies came to a conclusion that Open source is a
> viable business solution and are taking that step. It is an awesome step and
> should be encouraging, maybe some folks and blow life into Smith Project, or
> maybe Smith can merge with one of the big 2? This is a great annoucement,
> and for the first time ever there are now more open source CFML engines than
> closed source CFML engines. Pretty freaking sweet.

I think it's great news for the CFML community in general, that one of
the engines will be so readily available.  However I disagree on the
comments about Smith; it's more likely to me that Smith would cease to
exist.  Its primary reason for existing was the fact it's open source,
but it was always the least-compatible 'alternative' engine and
possibly the slowest to develop.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:307021
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to