as an extra helper i would say if you are migrating from procedural to OO i would suggest MG, as it is fantastic and forces you down an OO route.
i havent done too much research on the others but when i was deciding, i posted a message on this forum and was told that MG is def more OO than others >I'm planning on using one of the MVC frameworks (probably MG, but I'll >look at Mach ii and OO Fusebox again as well) for a seperate project >that can be built from the ground up. This project has enough quirks >(like an existing url rewriter scheme) that I'd prefer not to try and >shoehorn in a whole framework. > >I agree though that having a framework that you make yourself use will >certainly aid in getting it "down". > >As for the getters/setters, I just read a posting and comments >discussion on Brian Kotek's blog that helps clarify the getter/setter >argument and I think I'll go ahead and do the extra work for >getters/setters. > >Thanks, >Judah > > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:314338 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
