I disagree and don't believe that the open source cfml languages need to offer wrappers for javascript libraries. Trying to keep up, and offer wrappers for these libraries only limits the programmer - the scattered js offerings of CF8 compared to the scope and depth of what's on offer from the js community is a testament to that.
I feel that os frameworks wrapping other os frameworks is counter intuitive. Side by side they are free to grow and to do their job brilliantly. Dominic 2009/6/22 Don L <[email protected]>: > Or, put it this way, I think the need for a "freebie cfml engine" + cool > latest ajax functions are of substantial value, but probably the way it is > now, is "freebie cfml engines" like BD, may not have native ajax functions > like what cf8 has ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:323788 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
