Dominic, I've read your posts and am very impressed and yes, technically the current architecture of the various open source cfml engines are probably most desirable - I'm not exactly in a position to draw a conclusion but just a sort of guess, here what I was talking off my head was, from business perspective I want to get this thing done or converted quickly. One option is, hop around for a very desirable technical solution or get it done quickly still as a good solution but more focus on the feature and/or design, and besides, I don't have the luxury as some big company. btw, I need to distribute my app and run locally.
> I disagree and don't believe that the open source cfml languages need > to offer wrappers for javascript libraries. Trying to keep up, and > offer wrappers for these libraries only limits the programmer - the > scattered js offerings of CF8 compared to the scope and depth of > what's on offer from the js community is a testament to that. > > I feel that os frameworks wrapping other os frameworks is counter > intuitive. Side by side they are free to grow and to do their job > brilliantly. > > Dominic > > > 2009/6/22 Don L <do...@yahoo.com>: > > Or, put it this way, I think the need for a "freebie cfml engine" + > cool latest ajax functions are of substantial value, but probably the > way it is now, is "freebie cfml engines" like BD, may not have native > ajax functions like what cf8 has ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:323792 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
