The only metrics I've looked at are the CF monitor and it's telling me that normal memory is ok. lots of cached templates (the txt files) but at the moment 700 of them only equal to 3.5 meg. Between the template cache, memory scope vars, and cached queries (none), I'm not looking at more than 4 meg in use. I'm thinking that maybe it's an issue of heavy multiple hits on the site that's taking a loooong time (which should not be). I posted up an issue I had with a client where there was a hit from some proxy server that seemed to keep CF threads open for a while, bogging down the system. I'm going to apply some code to test for that.
But it goes back to the initial question. What's a good JVM setting? You said 10 minutes. My settings seem to say every minute. Am I reading you right that I should change my settings to 10 minutes? In such a case, where would this go in the order of jvm arguments? -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=600000 Thanks for being patient with me. :) On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Wil Genovese<[email protected]> wrote: > > Neither, I was just commenting on your sessions. We do the same to > limit bot sessions. We just have that many people using Mlsfinder.com. > > It's only too high if your storing more session data in memory than > you can handle. No two applications and server environments are the > same. > > Have you enable metrics logging to see how your perm sizes are behaving? > > > Wil Genovese > > One man with courage makes a majority. > -Andrew Jackson > > A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well. > > On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Michael Dinowitz wrote: > >> >> Are you saying that 400 for me is low or high? >> If its low then the reason may be that I have special code in place to >> cause bots to either not have sessions or have sessions of 1 second in >> duration. Without this code, I expect many more sessions. Also, my >> standard session length is 15 minutes. >> If the number is high then maybe I should look into limiting session >> usage for some sites and/or some parts of a site. >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Wil Genovese<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If we had 400 sessions going at once we'd know something is wrong. >>> As >>> I look at our monitoring software I see about 15,000 active sessions. >>> This is normal for us and it's much higher during times of heavy >>> usage. Right now with that number of sessions and about 50 requests/ >>> second our servers are humming along without issue. It's when they >>> get under really heavy load that we begin to wonder when they're >>> going >>> to hit their tipping poi >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325140 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
