Gotcha. Thanks. :) On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Jason Fisher<[email protected]> wrote: > > Just a quick thought: If, for example, you are building reusable, > singleton components (sorry for the OO buzzwords, but it is descriptive > terminology), then you can load those CFCs into Application scope and have > them exist in memory only once but still be used across all requests in the > app. An include, by contrast, has to be rendered anew each time the outer > template is called. In other words, using components makes it easier to > encapsulate functionality, but there is otherwise little *functional* > difference. > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:326088 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
