> Keeping in mind that the most widely attractive framework might not
> be
> the best fit, probably FW/1 or maybe ColdBox or CFWheels. People
> seem
> hyped for 'em.
>
> And they're swell! They do their jobs well.
>
> Personally, I like the whole XML deal MG has. I don't leverage it
> right, at all, but it is a powerful concept (and one that I think is
> especially suited to framework use).
>
> I've already promised some actionpacks for MG, so that's going to
> happen regardless, but back when I first started with MG
> "actionpacks", I realized that it would be really easy to not tie
> anyone into MG itself. There's just a MG specific XML file for when
> you plug into MG. I use ColdSpring for configuring most things, and
> they can all leverage that, so that part's cool (unless someone wants
> to use LightWire- oh noes, it never ends! ;]).
>
> Personally I think it would be nothing but good to support as many
> frameworks as we possibly can. Replete with examples and docs and
> whatnot. That would be worth more than the sum of the parts, if that
> makes sense.
>
> A problem I have, is that I see everything relating. And thus I see
> ways of working smarter, vs. harder, *everywhere*. I almost have a
> compulsion to take the waste from one process and turn it into the
> food for another. The problem is, "everywhere" is a large area to
> cover.
>
> Well, /one/ of the problems with seeing /anything/ *everywhere*,
> obviously. :)
>
>
> I think most of what I see is evolution, so I'm not too worried- if I
> don't do it, someone will. :)
>
> Eventually.
>
> :Den
>
> --
> There must be something solemn, serious, and tender about any
> attitude
> which we denominate religious. If glad, it must not grin or snicker;
> if sad, it must not scream or curse.
> William James
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Carey Duryea wrote:
> >
> > i hear ya about frameworks being a fighting word, everyone sort of
> has there preference and basically there own set of goodies that
> relate to certain frame works. i woudl think going with one of the
> more popular ones would be good.
> > what do you think would be the most widely attractive
framework
Den,
sometimes when you talk , i'm like "whata reyou crazy" hahha but
seriously i'm obviously not as familar with teh variety of frameworks as you
are, but i'm thinking , how in the world can you accomidate all of them. i
thought picking one would create some kind of uniformity in the community we
create
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:333458
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
