> Right now, the way it's branded (and named), the argument is Cold Fusion vs. > .NET.
Why do you say that? > That is a hard argument, Why do you say that? > but the argument of .NET vs J2EE or Adobe vs. Microsoft is a much easier > argument. Why do you say that? Honestly, I'm not trying to be difficult, but none of those statements really seem to be as self-evident as you seem to think. ColdFusion is not just a competitor with .NET; it's a competitor with "pure" J2EE solutions. But if you were going to cast this as CF vs .NET, there are plenty of compelling arguments you can make for choosing CF over .NET. (And a decent number for choosing .NET also.) The same is true for .NET vs J2EE. And finally, Adobe vs Microsoft isn't a great argument to make in favor of CF - plenty of people use MS server products. Where's Adobe's server OS? Their database platform? Their Sharepoint analog? etc, etc, etc. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:334696 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
