> Because the best links I got out of my previous email were at best bleak. > The best link prompted an on-list response that we have 4 years to learn a > new language.
I don't get where "CF vs .NET" led to that. The Gartner paper isn't "CF vs .NET". It's an overall forecast on the value and the viability of CF. > Because that's the argument Ben Forta makes in his blog: > http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/node/46362 > > Comparing ASP.NET to ColdFusion is difficult. Actually, it's not just > difficult, it's simply incorrect, and not an apples-to-apples comparison... > In other words, deciding between ColdFusion and ASP.NET (and indeed, > defending ColdFusion against ASP.NET) first requires a .NET versus J2EE > discussion.... Well, that's a technical argument, and while technically accurate it's not going to convince the people in charge of the technicians. If I'm the guy making purchasing decisions, I can choose to go with Adobe's solution, Microsoft's solution, or any one of a bunch of other solutions. The fact that there's not a one-to-one correspondence between ASP.NET and CF doesn't really matter. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:334701 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
