On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using the for(i=1; i <= ArrayLen(myArray); i++) syntax because i > know it works everywhere. I would much rather use a for-in loop but > due to the changes that Adobe made in 9.0.1, Railo and Adobe are > temporarily incompatible. Railo has made changes to match > compatibility but it will be a bit before it makes its way to the > stable release.
True, it was adjusted to match the OpenCFML spec / ACF9.0.1 in 3.1.2.016 (we're at 3.1.2.018 now) and will be part of the stable 3.2 release 'soon'. > Another example would be transactions. I wanted to write a transaction > in cfscript today. I know that CF9 supports it. I don't know if Railo > or OpenBD does or if they do, whether there are any major differences. According to JIRA, Railo added cfscript transaction support in 3.1.2.014: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/RAILO-749 but nested transactions are not yet supported: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/RAILO-689 -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:335667 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
