This means nothing to me without proper test procedures and full disclosure of the source code and test data for each test and the hardware specifications that were used along with databases and network specs. There's a large number of variables involved and I can attest to the fact that getting even one wrong can adversely affect a test environment. Externals such as networks, file systems, operating systems, performance tuning, the java layer, databases and more can have very large affects on the results for each of the languages you "tested".
Wil Genovese Sr. Web Application Developer/ Systems Administrator [email protected] www.trunkful.com On Oct 19, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Ketan Jetty wrote: > > This can lead to lots of controvertial posts. I did some performance testing > long back between HTML, CF, PHP, ASP.NET and Java. The benchmark was a static > HTML page and everything was measured against the performance of HTML. > Criteria used in the benchmarking was to generate a datetime stamp, results > from 5 queries to DB and a 50K page size > > The performance results matrix is given below: > HTML 100% (static DataTime stamp and no queries to DB) > PHP 90% of HTML > ASP.NET 80% of HTML > JAVA 75% of HTML > CF 40% of HTML [but I can say that CF is slowly improving] > > These are my findings and may change from time to time. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:338339 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
