And to add to that, I can say that *if* I did have deep knowledge of what is going on with CF X, I *might* say that when people see what is coming, the naysayers are going to feel really silly.
Really, really silly. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Brian Kotek <[email protected]> wrote: > To be fair, Matt, I'm not sure how it works for the other products, but the > CF ACPs absolutely do have a very high level of input. We get (or may not > get, heh, I don't know where the NDAs affect what I can say) ongoing > briefings and opportunities for input on features as product development as > it goes on. > > That said, part of the reason the CAB (Customer Advisory Board) was created > is to help separate the evangelism from the product guidance. And a very > large number (if not all) of the ACPs are on the CAB, along with a number of > others who are not ACPs. > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Matt Quackenbush > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> By the way, the notion that the ACP program was intended to serve as an >> advisory board or steering committee for the product could not be more off >> base. The ACP program is 100% marketing. Period. It **is** about >> "fanbois". (http://www.adobe.com/communities/professionals/) >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:342262 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
