>Same here and that is basically what we are doing today with Verity.  This
>whole thread though is making me want to get started on Solr testing since
>the plan was eventually to migrate from our Verity solution to Solr.
>

Hhm, I wonder if I just need to switch over the Verity then? Didn't really want 
to redo all the syntax for my searches, but if it works....
Yeah, I agree it seems like there should be *some* way around this! It's fairly 
easy to test this, by putting some cfindex code into a loop. But it appears to 
have a lot to do as well with the size of the collection, so you have to be 
sure to load it with enough records to see the problem. My collection has a lot 
of data, which is why I didn't see this earlier in testing when I had a small 
sub-set of data loaded, the Solr searches would do their work quickly and move 
on. It was only when I started loaded my entire set of data that I started 
seeing the problem, as Solr then was taking a lot longer to create a new 
searcher, run the index code, and then destroy the searcher after it was done. 
So they pile up very quickly if you are running a bunch of cfindex tags in one 
request. I could probably figure out a way to bulk load my batch functions, but 
that still leaves me with problems if multiple users are adding data at once. 


--- Mary Jo







~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:343655
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to