Philip ContentBox is not using ColdBox as you describe, let me be very clear here. A framework helps you achieve common application problems, for example ColdBox provides the ability to provide AOP and ContentBox uses this feature of the framework heavily. But the framework was not as you put it designed to work with the CMS.
Regards, Andrew Scott WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/ Google+: http://plus.google.com/113032480415921517411 On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Phillip Vector <vec...@mostdeadlygame.com>wrote: > > >Right! That's my question, since a CMS system already has a form of > framework built inside, there's no need for a Framework. Why not just > always use a CMS and custimze to your heart's content? > > There isn't always a framework built into it (or if there is one, it's been > set up specifically for the CMS). > > The reason you don't always use a CMS is too varied to get into here. > Suffice it to say that CMS systems aren't always the best way to make > webpages. > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Nils Nehrenheim > <n...@thecomputerchief.com>wrote: > > > > > Right! That's my question, since a CMS system already has a form of > > framework built inside, there's no need for a Framework. Why not just > > always use a CMS and custimze to your heart's content? > > > > > > > >>Why would I choose a CF Framework over a CF CMS system? > > > > > > I'm affraid you are comparing apples and oranges. > > > You would use a CF framework to develop a CMS system but you wouldn't > > > have to develop anything if you use a CMS system. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:357305 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
