On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Raymond Camden <raymondcam...@gmail.com> wrote: >
> Right - but you said Adobe was ignoring this. Please back your statement > up. I said the CF team could possibly do more. But I do not agree that they > are ignoring the issue. I did not say Adobe was ignoring the issue, I said that some employees and evangelists were ignoring that people existed who were not aware of the issue. And I meant mostly in this thread because of the three or so people who seem to think the current method of installing would be fine if the users would do their job with little acknowledgement of the company's role in the problem. > A position that does not agree with you is not one of attack. Tone is everything. You can state a position that does not agree without getting snarky about it. > Also - I do not blindly defend Adobe. I've got a *huge* history of > reporting bugs, making suggestions, and generally trying to make CF a > better product. If I thought the CF team was perfect then I wouldn't be > trying to help improve it. That may be the case when you are at work, but I haven't seen it here much. You do a lot of good work for the CF community and I appreciate it greatly. But on this list, anytime I have posted a criticism of Abode products or procedures, I've gotten a face full of what feels like "shut up and go away". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:358168 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
