I am sorry, but I am actually sure you are overestimating the amount of
people that buy Ultradev for its abilities to write CFML. The vast majority
of Ultradev users are ASP developers, I would say more than 80%, I don't
have exact numbers, but I use Ultradev since its early days, even before is
was available to the public, and follow all the forums dedicated to it, I
even do seminars for Macromedia Italy about the baby, in fact, Macromedia
people kindly ask me to run my demos for Ultradev on ASP... (a pain in the
ass for a CFML geek like me).
Apart from that, even if I like Ultradev a lot, and I see some very great
potential in it, it still has some *serious* issues on CFML, issues that are
not inside its ASP or JSP implementations, it may sound silly or hard to
believe, but the language that Ultradev really got wrong is CFML...
----------------------------
Massimo Foti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------
My own Corner of the web
http://www.massimocorner.com
Dreamweaver, Ultradev and Fireworks goodies
It should be this hole in the ozone layer
But I am not the coder I use to be...
"Adrian Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:00ac01c0d037$9b0f8c40
> I would also be most interested to see a breakdown of sales of Cold Fusion
> Server (in all of its forms) and Ultradev.
>
> Why? e.g. Because if CF was free, and a hundred times or more developers
used it
> as a direct result, (there might well be multiple developers, and multiple
> licensed copies of Ultradev per server), and which resulted in the sales
of a
> hundred times or more copies of Ultradev - I would like to see where the
most
> profit would come from. My guess is that it would easily be the latter.
>
> Adrian Cooper.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
