COmpanies that try to eradicate web items they do not like should be 
put on a list and publically humiliated...

It is just such a dumb solution and keep those fancy expensive lawyers 
busY making money and the courts clogged with useless mounds of 
paperwork...

change the encryption, framework it, or drop it...

-paris
[finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Top-Link Tech (John Ceci))
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:49:09 -0500
Subject: RE: Need decryptor tag for CFUG presentation

> Howie,
> 
> I would agree with getting off the net is impossible, that is why I
> presented #2, change the basic encryption scheme to something
> different,
> there are plenty of methods to encrypt a file that have a
> user-defined key
> that are fast...so just change to a different method, now it might
> only take
> a week or two for someone to crack that too, but some type of effort
> by MM
> to combat this is necessary...
> 
> John
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Need decryptor tag for CFUG presentation
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Top-Link Tech (John Ceci)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 11:17 AM
> Subject: RE: Need decryptor tag for CFUG presentation
> 
> 
> > Ray,
> >
> > I would agree with your statement competely...
> >
> > BUT, since this program exists, and we have known that it exists
> for some
> > time there are a couple of things MM should have done...
> > #1. MM needs to find who wrote it and get the tag off the internet
> 
> It's no secret:
> 
> Matt Chapman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> And, if you search the net you'll find it all over the place
> (including
> source code) so getting it off the net is not going to
> happen.  I've even seen it offered as shareware (if you can believe
> that!)
> 
> > #2. MM needs to change the encryption methodology inside of CF5.0
> in the
> > first SP which will then totally take the program out of
> usefulness...
> >
> 
> The problem with the cf encryption is that it needs to be fast and
> have a
> know key so this type of encrypton can be compromised.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Howie
> 
> > John
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to