> I think the core problem in this discussion is that the
> Macromedia acolytes
Macromedia acolytes? I've been a ColdFusion developer for a LONG time, much
before I went to Macromedia. I also began this discussion by simply saying
that I _thought_ the use of a decryptor was illegal, and that I thought in
_general_ it wasn't right, and, I made it clear, that I did not speak for
Macromedia.
I do my best to help people on this list. I am not here selling ColdFusion
or trying to spy on people who use the decryptor. I'm a coder, not a layer.
Yes, my email address is @ Macromedia.com, but that is only because cf-talk
doesn't easily allow you to post from multiple addresses. If the only way
you will believe that I'm saying _my_ opinion is for me to change email
addresses, well, then maybe that's something I need to do.
I think most people here know me and know that I am _not_ a corporate mouth
piece for Macromedia.
> The dark side is a tempting mistress, no?
Sure it is. As is ignorance, Steve.
Raymond Camden, who works for Macromedia, but also, believe it or not, has
his own opinions.
p.s. Perhaps it is time for us to take this to cf-community?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
