Mike,
Unfortunately I deleted the message. I am hoping that the new list's archive
feature will be up soon. You might send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask him where the archive is.
The new Website Professional web server list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
subscribe send an e mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
"join" or "subscribe" in the body.
Best Regards,
Dennis Powers
UXB Internet
(203) 879-2844
http://www.uxbinfo.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Website vs. IIS
I tend to run a very secure ship, even at home behind my firewall. I'm going
to look at the package you mentioned but I've user Whisker from RFP to do my
security scans and I'm tight. It's less a security thing as a stability and
feature one.
Could you forward me Bob's post and/or the location for it. Would go far in
telling me where to stay.
> Mike,
>
> With out bashing IIS, the reason I still and will continue to use Website
is
> because IIS requires too much time to maintain and secure against all the
> script kiddies. Based on the post from Bob Denny in the new website email
> list I am confident that it will continue as a viable software platform.
>
> IIS can be secured, but the time and diligence it takes to do so is more
> than this little webmaster extraordinaire can afford <laugh>.
>
> Get a copy of twwwscan (http://search.iland.co.kr) and run it against your
> O'Reilly web site webs and then run it against an IIS setup. You will be
> surprised.
>
> As an example I friend of mine told me his IIS web site had no
> vulnerabilities, I ran the scan and got over three pages of problems. Now
> to be honest this is more and example of his proficiency, or lack of, with
> IIS, but his skills are about par with the average ISP.
>
> I prefer Website to IIS, but that is my two cents.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Dennis Powers
> UXB Internet
> (203) 879-2844
> http://www.uxbinfo.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Website vs. IIS
>
> All the posting problems since Saturday is due to use having a new box and
> the DNS moving around. One question that came up with the new box was the
> webserver. I've used Website 2 for the longest time and love it. The new
box
> is a Win2k box and I was wondering if there was any reason that I should
be
> using IIS instead. Anyone know the pros and cons of this? Thanks
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
