I have developed "dynamic" websites in perl, php, coldfusion, c, and
jsp/servlets and CF has the FASTEST development cycle.As far as "why not
more CF developers because its easy?" just because something is supposedly
easy doesn't make people jump on it. Look for another job. 

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, BILLY CRAVENS wrote:

> Sounds like a trick argument to me.  Trying to argue the merits of a product
> based on the number of users is flawed.  Focus on the flaws and limitations
> of FrontPage.  If he doesn't want to go CF, so be it, but make sure he's
> aware that the other options for dynamic development include ASP, PHP, JSP,
> Perl, etc, but that FP is not an option.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:40 PM
> Subject: "Why aren't there more CF programmers out there?"
> 
> 
> > A higher up said "If ColdFusion was so easy to learn why aren't there more
> > CF programmers out there?"
> >
> > So what do I tell him?
> >
> > How many CF Developers are there?
> > How many sites use CF?
> >
> > Is there a Macromedia rep in the house?
> >
> > He thinks FrontPage is the way to go....
> >
> > Let the games begin!
> >
> > 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to