I think it was PCWorld who did the bechmarks during the 4.x era where CF was #3. They updated their benchmarks when 5 came out and it blew the rest of them away. I haven't seen any updated php 4 performance test yes though...not that I care :) I just wish CF had the built in socket library that php does...
jon Carlisle, Eric wrote: >The benchmarks I've seen favor PHP, then ASP, CF, then JSP. >I'm curious to know if there are new comparitive benchmarks for CF5. From >what I hear, there's a dramatic performance increase in CF5. > >Performance is very important, but try to not let that be the only concern. >There are many good reasons why or why not to choose a particular middleware >platform. > > EC > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steven Dworman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:26 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: asp vs. cf > > >Thanks for all the input. My boss is looking for something a little more >specific. Let's say for example that we have a set number of screens to >develop, say 24 :). A third of them are for display purposes only, so now >we're down to 16 screens that have input forms and such. When developing a >form, both display and action what kind of time difference are we looking at >between asp and cf? Also what kind of hardware are we looking at for a 2000 >user application. More or less or same with cf or asp? > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
