And this is why CF is so good, because it is flexible enough to allow others to make tags/functions/Com Objects to add this functionality. Sure it has taken time to get it here, but with the work of intuitive people then CF will flourish even stronger by the imagination of its developers.
-----Original Message----- From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2001 12:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: asp vs. cf I think it was PCWorld who did the bechmarks during the 4.x era where CF was #3. They updated their benchmarks when 5 came out and it blew the rest of them away. I haven't seen any updated php 4 performance test yes though...not that I care :) I just wish CF had the built in socket library that php does... jon Carlisle, Eric wrote: >The benchmarks I've seen favor PHP, then ASP, CF, then JSP. >I'm curious to know if there are new comparitive benchmarks for CF5. From >what I hear, there's a dramatic performance increase in CF5. > >Performance is very important, but try to not let that be the only concern. >There are many good reasons why or why not to choose a particular middleware >platform. > > EC > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
