I think its more of an issue of which technology fits your needs best. WDDX used to be better integrated with CF but with the latest versions of CF and the work of companies like granularity and siteobjects that no longer the case.
HTH, Duane -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: WDDX I'm not sure if this is OT or not but here goes... Why would I use WDDX instead of just using straight XML? -there are SEVERAL good parsers out there. -The javascript that it takes to create the "packets" is not that complex. -The "packets" aren't really any kind of packets their just strings that are parsed...XML? and more... I actually am interested in using it and I have no direct quams with using WDDX but why would I use it when we have an XML framework already built for other applications? Thanks- Savan ______________________________________________________________________ Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
