> Yes, there would. OK. That's what I really wanted to know.
> It is not like every web application server is implemented > the same. Depending on how they are implementing greatly > affects how you tune them. In the case of ColdFusion, it > originally came from Windows land, where the only way to > make a high performance application is to use threads. The > opposite is generally true in the Unix world and is certainly > true in the Linux world. Again, Linux doesn't offer native > threads, so the ColdFusion has to make use of threading > libraries that emulate threads on top of processes. Do you know if this is still the situation for CF 5? > It was also during this time that I tried to build a > ColdFusion stub for Tux, RedHat's in kernel web server > that holds all the performance records. While I > successfully executed a few ColdFusion requests, I was > so far off from getting it to work that I gave up. > Although, I had proven that it could be done. Yes, but then your CF crashes would be much more serious! > Anyway, like I said in the last email, this is all a moot > point now anyway. I can now easily average hundreds of > requests a second per server these days with ColdFusion. I suspect that it'll become even more irrelevant with CF MX. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
