> > Yes, but then your CF crashes would be much more serious! > > > Why? It is not like CF is executing in the kernel. It is still > a userland application as only the stub operated in the kernel.
The problem with email is, no one can tell what's intended as a joke without the use of emoticons. I realize that the module itself is unlikely to crash your server. > > I suspect that it'll become even more irrelevant with CF MX. > > I doubt it, as J2EE's scalability doesn't come from the fact > that it can handle a significant number of requests per second. > No, J2EE's scalability comes from the fact that can distribute > the load across machines very well using EJBs. On a single machine, > one of my CF 5 applications would eat CFMX for lunch. Perhaps, but that's not my point, which is simply that because CF MX will "ride" on top of an existing J2EE server, you probably won't have to know as much about the internals of CF MX to tune your server - instead, you'll have to know about the specifics of WebLogic or JRun or whatever you choose. I suspect that BEA and IBM might spend more time and money figuring out server optimization than MM. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
