> Do you know if this is still the situation for CF 5? > Of course it is. Not like CF 5 changed the basic architecture of the application at all. However, enough things changed both in the Linux kernel and in CF itself (thanks Jessie) that allowed CF produce a 400% performance improvement of 4.5.1 in some cases.
> Yes, but then your CF crashes would be much more serious! > Why? It is not like CF is executing in the kernel. It is still a userland application as only the stub operated in the kernel. > I suspect that it'll become even more irrelevant with CF MX. > I doubt it, as J2EE's scalability doesn't come from the fact that it can handle a significant number of requests per second. No, J2EE's scalability comes from the fact that can distribute the load across machines very well using EJBs. On a single machine, one of my CF 5 applications would eat CFMX for lunch. -Matt ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
