Seeing as how JDBC is the CF flavor of the day going forward, the comparison seems 
reasonable to me.  Having said that, there is no doubt in my mind the SQL Server JDBC 
drivers are broken by design, and I would expect some third party to eventually 
release something better.

Kevin

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/15/02 01:28PM >>>
article here

http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s=708&a=23115,00.asp 


also you have to take into account that they were using JDBC drivers and
MSSQL had problems.

Quoted:
Due to its significant JDBC (Java Database Connectivity) driver problems,
SQL Server was limited to about 200 pages per second for the entire test. 

Anthony Petruzzi
Webmaster
954-321-4703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.sheriff.org 


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: MS SQL vs MySQL WAS: [admin] List status


What about the recent comparison in eWeek between MySQL, Oracl9i and
SQL2k? MySQL was neck and neck with Oracle in response time and
throughput, both better than SQL2k?

> >I know that MySQL cannot really stand up to MS SQL but
> >when you are talking about the amount that MS SQL costs
> >versus using MySQL, I would us MySQL unless someone just
> >wanted to pay for MS SQL.
> >
> >--
> >Clint Tredway
> >----------------------------------
> >Through Him, anything is possible.
> >> Can you say crap. :)
> >>
> >> I am not a big fan of MySQL.  I have to do some work in it and it pales
> >> in comparison.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:19 PM
> >> To: CF-Talk
> >> Subject: Re: [admin] List status
> >>
> >> Can you say "MySQL?"
> >>
> >> <g>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Margaret Fisk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:10 PM
> >> Subject: RE: [admin] List status
> >>
> >>
> >> > Actually, we just priced this:
> >> >
> >> > It is about $5000 per cpu if you get SQL Server Standard edition and
> >> about
> >> > 20,000 (not sure about this one) per cpu if you want Enterprise
> >> edition. The
> >> > difference between the editions is failover and uptime tools.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 


______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to