Yes, the noteworthy thing is how well mySQL did against Oracle, rather than how badly MS did with buggy beta drivers. Pretty good for a freebie Access replacement.
--------------------------------------- Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com --------------------------------------- ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- from: "Jon Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:46:07 -0400 Heh, this article truely cannot be used as ammunition for any anti-MS people. They do all this testing with beta JDBC drivers, and pronouce MySQL and Oracle winners, then they throw in one sentence on how under Win2k/ODBC/ASP outperformed all of them by over 300 page view per second but it really doesn't count. lol jon ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: RE: MS SQL vs MySQL WAS: [admin] List status > article here > > http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s=708&a=23115,00.asp > > > also you have to take into account that they were using JDBC drivers and > MSSQL had problems. > > Quoted: > Due to its significant JDBC (Java Database Connectivity) driver problems, > SQL Server was limited to about 200 pages per second for the entire test. > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
