Actually, that was the point I was going to make. You can go look at more fair Oracle vs MSSQL comparisons for sure, but if MySQL is neck and neck with Oracle, then it has to be doing pretty well.
> Yes, the noteworthy thing is how well mySQL did against Oracle, rather > than how badly MS did with buggy beta drivers. Pretty good for a > freebie Access replacement. > > --------------------------------------- > Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com > --------------------------------------- > > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > from: "Jon Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:46:07 -0400 > > Heh, this article truely cannot be used as ammunition for any anti-MS > people. They do all this testing with beta JDBC drivers, and pronouce MySQL > and Oracle winners, then they throw in one sentence on how under > Win2k/ODBC/ASP outperformed all of them by over 300 page view per second but > it really doesn't count. lol > > jon > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:28 PM > Subject: RE: MS SQL vs MySQL WAS: [admin] List status > > > > article here > > > > http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s=708&a=23115,00.asp > > > > > > also you have to take into account that they were using JDBC drivers and > > MSSQL had problems. > > > > Quoted: > > Due to its significant JDBC (Java Database Connectivity) driver problems, > > SQL Server was limited to about 200 pages per second for the entire test. > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
