I took the following from the CF Livedocs

COM objects
ColdFusion MX uses the Java Native Interface (JNI) to call COM objects,
which results in slower performance than in ColdFusion 5. How much slower
depends on the application and COM, but in the Macromedia tests of the same
code, ColdFusion 5 completed in 50 milliseconds and ColdFusion MX completed
in 2-3 seconds.


Does anybody know if this affects the performance of the XML tollkit and
SOXML - they both use COM don't they???

Cheers,

Martin


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Farrar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [cf-xml] ColdFusion MX and XML


> Here are the live docs...
>
> http://livedocs.macromedia.com/cfmxdocs/
>
> go to this page...
>
>
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/cfmxdocs/CFML_Reference/functions-pt022.jsp#3
> 468770
>
> Let me know if you need more information than this page gives. The
question
> about finding a node's parent node... with XML it seems like you would
know
> the parent node or you could not reach the child node? Were you asking how
> to find a child node? Could you give me an example... that will help.
>
> John Farrar
>
> > Does ColdFusion MX provide a way to access typical methods and
properties
> of nodes when working with XML?  How do you find a particular node's
parent
> node for example?
> >
> > Thanks - Tom
> >
> > -----------------------+
> > cf-xml mailing list
> > http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm
> >
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------+
> cf-xml mailing list
> http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm
>
>


-----------------------+
cf-xml mailing list
http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm

Reply via email to