Me three...by all means
--- John Farrar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let the polls begin... I want an MX version. > > John Farrar > > > Hi Martin > > > > Although I haven't done any serious testing, I've > been surprised by the > > decent performance of COM objects in ColdFusion > MX, including the XML > > Toolkit. Nevertheless, we've rewritten most of > the XML functions in our > > applications to use the new native XML features. > > > > As an example, you can download an MX version of > the CF_XMLQuery tag from > > > > http://torchbox.com/xml > > > > If there's enough interest in MX versions of the > other Toolkit tags we > could > > rewrite these. Perhaps I'll do a poll on CF/XML > usage and desires... > > > > Tom > > > > -----------------+ > > tom dyson > > t: +44 (0)1608 811870 > > m: +44 (0)7958 752657 > > http://torchbox.com > > > > > I took the following from the CF Livedocs > > > > > > COM objects > > > ColdFusion MX uses the Java Native Interface > (JNI) to call COM objects, > > > which results in slower performance than in > ColdFusion 5. How much > slower > > > depends on the application and COM, but in the > Macromedia tests of the > same > > > code, ColdFusion 5 completed in 50 milliseconds > and ColdFusion MX > completed > > > in 2-3 seconds. > > > > > > Does anybody know if this affects the > performance of the XML tollkit and > > > SOXML - they both use COM don't they??? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------+ > > cf-xml mailing list > > http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm > > > > > > > -----------------------+ > cf-xml mailing list > http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com -----------------------+ cf-xml mailing list http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm
