They should be upgraded to native CFMX - XML features. The native features are faster than using COM objects in CF 5 from my experience.
John Farrar > I took the following from the CF Livedocs > > COM objects > ColdFusion MX uses the Java Native Interface (JNI) to call COM objects, > which results in slower performance than in ColdFusion 5. How much slower > depends on the application and COM, but in the Macromedia tests of the same > code, ColdFusion 5 completed in 50 milliseconds and ColdFusion MX completed > in 2-3 seconds. > > > Does anybody know if this affects the performance of the XML tollkit and > SOXML - they both use COM don't they??? > > Cheers, > > Martin > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Farrar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:24 PM > Subject: Re: [cf-xml] ColdFusion MX and XML > > > > Here are the live docs... > > > > http://livedocs.macromedia.com/cfmxdocs/ > > > > go to this page... > > > > > http://livedocs.macromedia.com/cfmxdocs/CFML_Reference/functions-pt022.jsp#3 > > 468770 > > > > Let me know if you need more information than this page gives. The > question > > about finding a node's parent node... with XML it seems like you would > know > > the parent node or you could not reach the child node? Were you asking how > > to find a child node? Could you give me an example... that will help. > > > > John Farrar > > > > > Does ColdFusion MX provide a way to access typical methods and > properties > > of nodes when working with XML? How do you find a particular node's > parent > > node for example? > > > > > > Thanks - Tom > > > > > > -----------------------+ > > > cf-xml mailing list > > > http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------+ > > cf-xml mailing list > > http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm > > > > > > > -----------------------+ > cf-xml mailing list > http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm > -----------------------+ cf-xml mailing list http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm
