> *nix TOC oops. I meant (unix-based) TCO (total Cost of ownership)
...I'm lysDexic On 5/8/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cf on linux may be cheaper then .net on windoze > > especially when you consider total cost of ownership what with > Microsoft Licencing. Check it out- it ain't cheap. they lock you in > with (virtually) free dev tools (anyone still got their freebie > VS2005? mine's unloved...) and then sting you with the licence fees. > > IMHO, the only downside to "linux-based" is getting the > expertise/Guru(s) to get the best out of it (the achillies heal on > *nix TOC). A sysadmin friend of mine is doing amazing things at his > work with FreeBSD, donated computers and a bunch of Win98 "thin > clients". Their sister business (MS everything) is one big blank check > to write.... > > > eh my 2c > > > On 5/8/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I hate to say it but my little team hear, may have to jump to .NET soon > > >but I don't want to make that decesion. But if the clients want it we > > >do it. > > > > Hi Jeremy > > very funny cfdump joke > > > > now if pricing is simply the only reason for changeing why not php or 1 of > > the many other free languages over .net? > > you already said they are using windoze, so no use me saying cf on linux may > > be cheaper then .net on windoze :S > > > > M@ > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
