Lol... I remember that breakfast Barry!

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> a fair point, Blair
>
> the other side of the equation of course is too much hand-holding that
> it gets in the way, either by abstracting too much of the detail so
> you don't know what's happening under the covers - or - it just plain
> gets it wrong in edge-cases (special headers needed in CF webservices
> spring to mind)
>
> I've still got a great memory of a WebDU breakfast a couple of years
> back where Chuck was showing how easy it was to build an ASP.NET
> application in VS2005 ... which promptly broke when he ran it and he
> had to go back to rebuild it and apply some setting he'd forgotten ...
> happens to the best of us.
>
>
> but this isn't helping Adam much...
>
> Adam, if you're still reading this, revisit the CFC dev website to get
> a feel for how important "it depends" means when someone like Sean
> Corfield says it.
>
> simple things will get you most of the way there
>  - keep your view totally separate from your data access code
>  - identify the "Gold" code (ie: it costs a fortune to make) and
> protect that "investment" (eg: from change + retesting)
>  - you can probably get away with having DAO's for single record
> access (CRUD) and "gateway" CFC's for the rest. At least it's
> something. Lots of choices to join up the middle bits
>  - look at what Transfer can give you as a way to get things happening
> quickly for data access
>  - queries are more convenient (and faster) than arrays of objects,
> structs easier to pass around than single objects
>  - you gotta know the rules before you break them but breaking them is OK
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to